Here is a pleasant reminder that the Web does not at all times get it proper, particularly relating to nu-metal.
That is one thing we discovered through the years due to our Wikipedia: Reality or Fiction sequence right here at Loudwire. Sure, Wikipedia can give a wealth of helpful details about your favourite bands, however the concept that with regards to someone can give updates has led to a couple misinterpretations of sure details or instantly up falsehoods to search out their manner right into a band’s historical past.
For example, Incubus’ Brandon Boyd used to be stunned to be told that the track “Power” most effective had that name after the band allegedly determined to not name it “I will Be There” because of a battle with the vintage ’70s Jackson 5 ballad. Boyd replied, “I am so gonna pass on there later and inform some stories.”
READ MORE: The 50 Highest Nu-Steel Albums of All-Time
Godsmack’s Sully Erna, Slipknot’s Shawn “Clown” Crahan, Disturbed’s David Draiman, Korn’s Brian “Head” Welch, Linkin Park’s Joe Hahn and the contributors of Papa Roach additionally dispute probably the most pieces that experience grew to become up on their respective Wikipedia pages.
Take a look at probably the most lies the Web has informed us about nu-metal underneath.
Lies the Web Informed About Nu-Steel
Each ‘Giant 4’ Nu-Steel Album, Ranked From Worst to Highest
Between Korn, Limp Bizkit, Linkin Park and Gadget of a Down — certainly, the “Giant 4” bands of nu-metal — how do all their albums stack up when ranked in combination? It is no stroll within the park pitting those discographies in opposition to every different. Learn underneath to look each album through nu-metal’s “Giant 4,” ranked from worst to easiest.
Gallery Credit score: Philip Trapp + Chad Childers
